Political Rewind: Transparency, Prison Closures in the News

As we start a new week, it's always good to get caught up on state politics. Here's an easy guide to what happened last week.

Editor's Note: This article was created by aggregating news articles from Illinois Watchdog, formerly Illinois Statehouse News.

Week in Review: Transparency, Prison Closures in the News

SPRINGFIELD – Gov. Pat Quinn increased transparency in one part of state government this week, but his own office failed to release emails that could shine light on his handling of public discourse about prison closures.

Prepaid tuition fund to become more transparent

Illinois families who invested in the state’s troubled prepaid tuition program will enjoy more transparency in the system because of legislation signed into law Wednesday.

The bill, House Bill 3923, requires meetings about the state’s prepaid tuition fund, known as College Illinois!, to be open to the public under the state’s Open Meetings Act.

The prepaid tuition program has been a source of consternation for legislators and parents because of controversial investment decisions and an unfunded liability of more than $500 million.

Josh Sharp, director of government relations for the Illinois Press Association, which champions open meetings and public records, applauded eliminating the open meetings exemption for the fund. It goes beyond the issue of taxpayer dollars, he said.

“You’re dealing not just with taxpayer money, but with people who decided to give money to the state to invest for them. We don’t think those decisions should be made necessarily behind closed doors,” he said.

Quinn’s office denies request for messages about southern Illinois appearance

Gov. Pat Quinn’s office last week denied a request for emails and texts regarding his appearance at a southern Illinois news conference that may have been moved to avoid protesters.

The July 16 appearance to talk about the drought originally was to take place at a Waltonville farmstead but instead took place in a field several miles away. Police monitored the entrance to the dirt lane that led to the location.

Rumors circulated that Quinn’s staff moved the event to avoid state workers and families who were protesting his proposed facility closures. The governor’s spokeswoman denied the rumors.

The governor’s attorney denied a Freedom of Information Act request by Illinois Watchdog, formerly Illinois Statehouse News, seeking correspondence about the event for a several-day period. Although about 10 emails were found that pertained to the FOIA request, the attorney denied the request, citing an exemption that allows officials to withhold preliminary drafts, notes and recommendations.

Don Craven, a Springfield attorney who specializes in open government matters, said the “preliminary drafts” exemption is overused and that taxpayers are entitled to review those types of communications.

“It’s got nothing to do with frantic emails or texts among the governor’s staff about where to set up a podium so he doesn’t have to look at state-employee protesters,” Craven said.

Quinn orders $40,000 special session to tackle pensions

Gov. Pat Quinn  for a special session later this month to hammer out pension reform, one of his top priorities for the state.

The cost for the state will be about $40,000.

Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, asked the governor to rethink the plan, saying he would call the Senate back for a regular session that day, which, by state law, makes lawmakers ineligible to be reimbursed for travel costs. If the governor calls a special session, taxpayers foot the bill for travel costs.

“I share the governor’s interest in resolving the lingering pension issues, but it makes no sense to spend thousands of taxpayer dollars when there is an easy, no-cost alternative,” Cullerton said.

Quinn spokeswoman Brooke Anderson on Friday said the governor feels “there can be no more delay on an issue that is costing taxpayers $12.6 million a day and putting the state at risk of a future downgrade.”

Legislative leaders met several times this summer in Chicago to come up with a pension-reform plan, after a proposal fell apart in the House in the final hours of the regular legislative session. Shifting suburban and downstate school pension costs from the state to local school districts was a sticking point for some legislators.

House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, already called representatives back on Aug. 17 to vote on possibly expelling indicted state Rep. Derrick Smith, D-Chicago, from the House. Madigan reportedly told union leaders he also intended to call a pension vote.

AFSCME files suit over proposed prison closures

The union that represents the state’s correctional officers and other prison workers filed a lawsuit Thursday seeking to stop Gov. Pat Quinn’s plan to close several correctional facilities throughout the state.

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31 filed the lawsuit in Alexander County in far southern Illinois. Alexander County is home to the Tamms “super-max” prison, which is one of the facilities slated for closure. The union is seeking an injunction to prevent inmates from being transferred to other prisons that are overcrowded and unsafe.

“The Quinn Administration is failing its duty to ensure a safe workplace for its employees. Instead, it is sending men and women to work each day in prisons that the state’s own actions are making more dangerous,” said AFSCME Council 31 executive director Henry Bayer in a news release.

“We’re asking the court to put a stop to these actions until our members are assured that when they pass through those prison gates, they will be as safe as possible.”

Other facilities to be closed are the Dwight Correctional Center; adult transition centers in Carbondale, Chicago and Decatur; and youth centers inJoliet and Murphysboro.

Meanwhile, longtime observers of the state’s prison system say the inmate assaults, lockdowns and other issues brought to light by AFSCME and reported in the media since mid-July have existed for years. What’s new is the attempt to apply public pressure to the Quinn administration, they say.

“There is increased tension, so there’s an increase in prisoner-on-prisoner fights, but that’s because it’s hot. And the prisons have been on lockdown and they’re overcrowded, and there are no programs left so everybody is sitting in their cells. So there’s a good story here, but it’s not the one being told,” said Alan Mills, legal director of the Chicago-based Uptown People’s Law Center, a nonprofit legal center that handles cases on behalf of inmates.

— Jayette Bolinski

Tom Whitcomb August 05, 2012 at 03:02 PM
Unfortunately we start the week with Quinn still our governor!
Infamous Steve August 05, 2012 at 03:27 PM
Yes I sadly agree with you...need to get him out of office. Hell w might of been better off with Rod and his helmet hair.
pro streeter August 05, 2012 at 04:06 PM
FYI Quinn is re-introducing legislation to the Illinois senate to ban assault rifle and magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammo. Be mindful to vote him out in his next election.
Kim K. August 05, 2012 at 04:20 PM
We need better alternatives to our current state governent
Bob Smid August 05, 2012 at 04:46 PM
And that's not all. Here is the link for more info about Quinn's actions on the gun control topic. http://nraila.org/legislation/state-legislation/2012/7/illinois-governor-abuses-amendatory-veto-powers-to-propose-semi-auto-ban.aspx The patch won't report on this and conveniently leaves it off their list of news worthy items.
Flora Dora August 05, 2012 at 08:59 PM
What we need is ethical people to lead our government who will support what they know to be good (despite which party it comes from) and to vote against that which is not good for their constituents.
Olddeegee August 05, 2012 at 09:17 PM
He's got my vote. Ban all but hunting rifles and handguns, but raise the price of ammo astronomically. If you need a gun to feel like a man, you're compensating for something.
Jello August 05, 2012 at 09:21 PM
Let me know when you find those mystical ethical people. I'll vote for them, for sure!
Henry James August 05, 2012 at 10:33 PM
Ethical people are out there, but unfortunately not enough the real people stand up and support them. The people won't take the time to get involved, get educated and for that matter vote, so those who are unethical keep getting elected by name recognition and big money support. This year I hope the real people wake up and stand up because we need to definitely change those who are representing us from local leaders to the Fed. representation
Karen Chadra (Editor) August 06, 2012 at 05:08 AM
Here's a blog about Quinn and gun control from Sen. Ron Sandack's office: http://elmhurst.patch.com/blog_posts/senate-week-in-review-lawmakers-set-to-return-to-springfield-august-17-quinn-amendatorily-vetoes-legislation-to-ban-semi-automatic-weapons-and-more
Nancy Rogers August 06, 2012 at 06:57 AM
We need a better state government!
John Roberts August 06, 2012 at 01:39 PM
I have seen the Juvenal Prison used as a baby sitter for parents that have children that acted just like they did when they were teenagers,by calling the police on their kids for running the streets,not taking the medication they have jacked their kids up on..then after so many calls the kids get sent to the facility...yeah kids in there cause mom and dad don't like how they are acting....Be parents to your kids and the need for another prison will be needed less.
John Roberts August 06, 2012 at 01:45 PM
You want transparency get into politics,don't be one of thoes people who says well there nothing I can do,there going to run it how they want....This is not the case get off your rump,complain,call your representatives,you know the ones on Facebook and the Internet that show you the pictures and says call this representative to stop this bill,or make this change,or to show your representative you support a bill, This is only one step in the right direction.make your representatives responsible for their actions,start with local,when you change the minds of local government,thoes members make it a point to bring it up to Congress and the House of Representatives then the politicians argue over it. be politically active this is how you change things.
Gregg R Stephens August 06, 2012 at 04:35 PM
What would any law abiding citizen need more than 10 rounds ammo. And nobody but law enforcement and military need assault rifles. It's going to take some wacko to kill hundreds to wake up America to the GUN PROBLEM.
Ernie Knight August 06, 2012 at 08:09 PM
According to a new report by the Government Accountability Office there are an estimated 8 MILLION law-abiding concealed carry permit holders carrying firearms in 49 states. Violent crime has decreased as concealed carry has expanded. Anyone with tactical knowledge of firearms and violent criminals will tell you that taking 10 rounds or less into a gunfight is not what you want to do, whether you are a civilian or not. Firearms are used every day all over the country, frequently by women and the elderly, to protect themselves from violent criminal predators. Is there some reason they should not have that chance?
Erik Bloecks August 06, 2012 at 09:58 PM
we need less governmnet.
ibthinkin August 07, 2012 at 03:20 AM
How about mandatory drug testing for all elected officials? And no book Advances & Royalties pay out untill they leave office... We are the employer and expect our employees to be sober (hard to tell if they are by some of the statements out there) We also expect that they do the job we hired them for FIRST.. Write a book on your own time... not on my time... Any Comments?
Gregg R Stephens August 07, 2012 at 03:42 PM
I'll stand by by comment I dont want anyone other than law enforcement and military getting into fire fights with assualt weapons in my town. That said, I have no problem with citizens possing firearms rfiles,hand guns, shot guns just not semi auto killing machines with 30 round clips.
Ernie Knight August 07, 2012 at 05:53 PM
There is aboslutely no functional difference between semi-auto hunting rifles and what politicians have called "assault weapons". Personally, I have a lot of trust in law-abiding civilians. And "assault weapons" are used in only a tiny fraction of 1% of all crime involving firearms. It's a political opportunity, not a crime problem. Check out more than the propaganda of the media and political left. By the way, after hurricanes and riots, when people were using "assault weapons" to protect themselves from rioters, looters and violent criminals, how many rounds do you think would be appropriate for them to have had in their firearms?
Ernie Knight August 08, 2012 at 01:04 PM
Sure Ron. Why should the elderly be allowed to protect themselves with one of the few options that would work? Apparently you're content to have them beaten, raped, robbed and killed. Personally if they're protecting themselves, I'll take the chance they might miss.
Edward Andrysiak August 10, 2012 at 07:46 PM
The gun argument is foolish. In illinois, Wisc, Mich and Indiana there are over 800,000 hunters. It is said they comprise the largest standing civilian army in the USA. That being said...do you really think everybody is simply going to walk up to the pile of guns and throw theirs in? Don't make me laugh! All that will happen is law abiding folks with guns will now become law breakers. You won't have enough jails to house them all nor will you ever really know who they are. As for the bad guys...all the Chicago laws, and there are a lot of them, do not stop the creeps from having guns. And, even if they couldn't buy them, they would make them like they did in the fifties out of car antennas. Those "zip guns" killed just as easily. The real answer may be to arm more *qualified* citizens. The Right to Carry may be the better way to go. The stastics prove that to be a fact.
Edward Andrysiak August 22, 2012 at 03:29 PM
As a follow up...I just learned that several Counties down State illinois refuse to prossecute anyone caught carrying a firearm on the basis that the Supreme Court has rules and it has been decided that it is a right extended to all citizens. So, in short, while our legislators try and figure a way to confiscate and otherwise restrict ownership...some in law enforcement have taken a step to level the playing field and follow the law of the land. . It is said the our Governer is going crazy trying to stop this from spreading to the entire state (except for Crook County). I always wondered why people were asking for permission to carry once the Supreme Court Ruled...they affirmed the right. I wonder too what Village governments with a law on the books indicating "it is illegal to discharge a fire arm within Village limits" will do. When asked the Police say they simply won't enforce it. But then, that depends on which police officer you talk to. The Lemont ordinance should be struck off of the books.
Gregg R Stephens August 22, 2012 at 04:44 PM
Oh great now any yahoo with a fire arm and can do target pratice in the back yard. I am going out this week to buy some body armor so I can mow the lawn this weekend. Anyone remember the person that was killed buy a 357 magnum round in bloomingdale a while back. Some genius was shooting at targets and killed him from almost a mile away.
blue gil August 22, 2012 at 04:57 PM
Up until a year ago, Syria had a no firearms tolerance for the general public. How is that working for them?
blue gil August 22, 2012 at 04:58 PM
If the public didn't have the firearms that we do, would we still have elections (although they are rigged to an extent)?
Tom Koz August 22, 2012 at 05:03 PM
There is NO such thing as an "assault weapon" !!!!! There are automatic firing weapons (pull the trigger ONCE and the weapon continue to fires), Semi-automatic firing wepaons (pull the trigger Once and the weapon reloads itself and you MUST pull the trigger again to fire the weapon (about 90% of ALL weapons)) an example would be a simple "6 shooter revolver, and then there are single action weapons (pull the trigger once and the operator must physically reload the weapon again before firing a second time). OH, and by the way, if someone uses a butter knife to attack you .... wouldn't that be an "assault weapon" ???
Barry Allen August 22, 2012 at 05:34 PM
Gregg, no any yahoo cannot do target practice in the backyard. Why? It IS against the law, Seriously against the law in almost every state. Reckless discharge of a firearm is a felony with 2 to 5 years in jail as a result. I grew up in Michigan where "every yahoo" has a firearm (no FOID cards required there). People in Michigan grow up respecting firearms and do not target practice in the backyard (at age 10 I knew that a .22 fired from a rifle had over a mile range). I suspect that the yahoo that legally owns a gun and doesn't respect it is rare.
Baba O'Riley August 22, 2012 at 08:04 PM
Agreed Barry. The media and all of the anti gun groups have spread this grave fear of guns. To the point where the fear is automatic. A gun does not kill, not the gun itself. I have yet to see the day when a gun loads itself, levitates to the air and begins firing. My Louisville Slugger under my bed is an assault weapon as well as my hands and feet. A ban on assault weapons will not stop crimes with guns. Ok, drugs are illegal right? Cocaine, heroin etc... are illegal. They are still readily available as can be seen in any suburban crime blotters. Conceal and carry is coming and Chicago has to realize that aside from a few collar counties the other 98% of Illinois doesnt care about them or their politics.
Edward Andrysiak August 23, 2012 at 02:00 AM
They need to get their act together in Chicago. Every day we see a TV report of a killing/s. Worst of all they don't know how to shoot. They always seem to get the bystander instead of the guy they are after. But, that aside, it's about the fight for turf and the drug money. The Chicago strategy was to hold the gang leader accountable for the bad things that happen on his turf. They did that sucessfully and jailed the leaders. What we see now is all the little gang bangers showing their stuff killing each other to climb the ladder. Guns are the aftermat of the drug problem. I some times think that legalizing drugs ends the turf wars. Do that and stop trying to register guns and we have a better chance at reducing crime. Legal drugs take the money out of the drug trade! I had a Doctor tell me that thirty years ago and I though he was nuts...now I think he was right.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »