patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

District 113A Board of Education: Allow Public Access to Documents

Board members on Tuesday decided to reinstate practice of posting documents related to meeting agenda items on the district’s website.

 

In a special meeting Tuesday night, members of the Lemont-Bromberek District 113A Board of Education discussed whether to continue posting documents related to board agendas online for public viewing, as the district had in the past.

In July, school district officials discovered that private documents dating back to October 2008 had somehow become visible to the public on BoardDocs, a paperless document management system that allows government entities to manage documents such as agendas, board minutes, financial statements and presentations online.

After conducting an investigation, district officials concluded later that month that the public access of items such as closed-session minutes on BoardDocs was “unrelated to staff actions.”

But since the conclusion of the investigation, members of the public have been unable to view documents related to the agenda on the school district’s website prior to board of education meetings.

“When the agenda is posted, there is nothing available to the public,” said board member Al Malley at Tuesday’s meeting. I’d like to find a comfortable medium.”

Malley said he thought it would make sense to move routine items such as accounts payable and payroll to the board’s consent agenda.

“But as far as what the public can see prior to the meeting, that’s up for discussion,” Malley said.

The use of BoardDocs originated in 2007, according Sandra Larek, administrative assistant to the superintendent. She said before that time, managing, copying and distributing documents to administrators and board members was a burdensome process. Using BoardDocs made the process more efficient, Larek said.

Superintendent Susan Birkenmaier, who took the reins as District 113A Superintendent July 1, said she thought the use of BoardDocs was “unique to Lemont-Bromberek,” and she didn’t know of any school districts that posts documents publicly before the board is able to view and discuss them.

Birkenmaier said that when the board was set to discuss development of a long-range strategic plan this summer, she was “a little surprised” when she read about the outline of the plan in the newspaper before she presented it. The superintendent’s  presentation had been posted on BoardDocs prior to the meeting.

You don’t know what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone …

As the board’s discussion continued, Malley worried aloud that the unavailability of public documents could negatively affect the public’s perception of the board’s transparency.

“It’s hard to have the information out there, and all of a sudden, there is nothing,” said Malley.

“I never saw a problem,” echoed board member Michael Aurelio. I don’t have any problem being transparent.”

But Board President Dave Molitor said he would prefer allowing board members to view the contents of documents before a meeting, then “put it out there the next day” for members of the public.

“This is our meeting,” said Molitor. “It’s not like we are withholding information. What’s the point of letting the public see it first?”

After several minutes of discussion, board members seemed to reach consensus on reinstating the board’s practice of using BoardDocs to post documents online for viewing by the public.

“I don’t think the intent was to not have anything out there,” Molitor said. “We will continue to make items available to the public.”

Related Topics: Agenda, Board of Education. BoardDocs, Lemont-Bromberek School District, and Transparency

Hank Olenick

11:04 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Seems the preferential treatment of a child who brought a handgun to school is not exactly being unbiased and fair. Student should have been expelled under state law, no exceptions....Right Dave?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Edward Andrysiak

11:25 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Ya know Hank...you have a right to say what you want but opening up this can of worms on a public forum when you cannot provide the full detail so we can see if your charges have merit does the School and Community a real dis-service. I can counter your finger pointing by saying there are a lot of stupid laws! Like the kid who got expelled because he did point his finger in a gun like way...at nobody! Without the facts here I have to go with those in power who made an intuitive decision to take the action they did. The flip side of your charge is that they just may have done the right thing!

Comment_arrow

Hank Olenick

3:40 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

You know Ed....the information was there, I didn't open anything. I simply posted a reply to what I saw... If you thing bringing a handgun to school is a "stupid law" , tell that to the parents friends and siblings of those who died at Columbine or Virginia Tech . You are trying to rationalize this as as an intuitive decision ? Based on what? Could it be who the child was related to?
"like the kid who got expelled because he did point his finger in a gun like way...at nobody!" Thank you for making my point.

Ann Paul

11:41 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

"This is our meeting" per Molitor (above). No, this is the public's meeting since we are the ones paying the bill. If Mr. Molitor desires to have total control of the board then he should pay the revenues in full and then he can have complete say so. Your purpose is to represent the taxpayers, as you were elected to do.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Heather N.

12:47 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

So I suppose if a resident read it before Mr. Molitor was able to read it (Board Members do have jobs) then it would be HIS fault because he's not informed. - Right?! Gosh, I guess you can have it both ways AP.

Edward Andrysiak

5:46 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

Does the bickering ever stop! The only "dog" I have in this fight is my tax dollar. But, I do care that our kids get a good education. Someone needs to pass out muzzels. I have served on many Boards and will tell you that you elect these good people to hear the facts and make the best collective decision they can as a Board. They work for us, we elected them and we should let them do their job. I'll be dam'd if I see the need to be sooooo transparent as to release data the Board hasn't reviewed, discussed and come to a decision on be it a binding finding or one to move the item forward on the agenda for further study or input from the community if needed. The idea that any * more * than an agenda listing the meeting day, date, time and items under consideration is required is foolish and the early release of data/attachments just hampers the Boards ability to operate efficiently. We all do not have a vote on agenda items and we all are not serving on that Board...let them do the job we elected them to do.

Reply

Heather N.

11:01 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Ann Paul - that is not what he is saying and you know it. Typical out of context. Work it how you want. I wouldn't want the public to see the information before I did either. Anything to support your cause I guess.

Reply

Indy

9:56 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

As a parent of a child in the district I am very concerned about the handgun comment. I would like more information and I feel there can be no exceptions when weapons of any kind are brought to school. I thought that incidents such as Columbine would have taught us that!

Reply

Leave a comment